Duke Of Norfolk Recast In Wolf Hall

Brembo

You need 2 min read

·

Post on Nov 11, 2024

35 visitor like this post

Share

A New Duke for Wolf Hall: Casting Changes and Historical Accuracy

The much-anticipated sequel to the acclaimed BBC series "Wolf Hall," based on Hilary Mantel's novels "Bring Up the Bodies" and "The Mirror & the Light," has been making headlines recently. But it's not just the return of Mark Rylance as Thomas Cromwell that has fans buzzing - the recasting of the Duke of Norfolk has sparked debate about historical accuracy and the artistic liberties taken in the adaptation.

In the original "Wolf Hall" series, the Duke of Norfolk was portrayed by the late, great Bernard Hepton. This portrayal, while undeniably effective, departed significantly from historical accounts. Hepton's Duke was a frail, elderly figure, seemingly more interested in chess than politics, a far cry from the powerful, ambitious, and influential historical figure he was.

For the sequel, the role has been entrusted to the charismatic actor and filmmaker, Jonathan Pryce. Pryce, known for his diverse roles and ability to embody complex characters, brings a new dimension to the Duke. This time, the character is presented as younger, more energetic, and far more politically engaged. This portrayal, while potentially more accurate historically, still maintains a certain dramatic license.

The historical Duke of Norfolk, Thomas Howard, was indeed younger than portrayed in the first series. He was only 56 years old at the time of Henry VIII's death, a far cry from Hepton's portrayal. He was also a staunch Catholic and a close advisor to the King, often acting as a moderating influence on the more radical members of the court.

The recasting of the Duke of Norfolk highlights the creative choices made by the producers and writers of the series. While the intention may be to present a more accurate historical portrayal, the decision also reflects a desire for greater dramatic impact. By presenting a more active, younger Duke, the series can explore the complexities of the Norfolk-Cromwell relationship in greater detail.

However, some historians have expressed concerns about the liberties taken with the historical record. They argue that the recasting, while not entirely inaccurate, does run the risk of distorting the historical truth for dramatic effect. They worry that the focus on the Duke's age and energy level might overshadow the more nuanced aspects of his personality and influence.

Ultimately, the success of the casting choice will depend on Pryce's performance and the series' ability to weave the Duke's story seamlessly into the larger narrative. Only time will tell whether the new Duke of Norfolk will live up to the expectations set by his predecessor, but one thing is certain: the recasting has sparked a fascinating conversation about the delicate balance between historical accuracy and dramatic license in television adaptations.